At Least It Pissed Off Liberals |
Many
conservatives, quite properly appalled by Donald Trump, insist that he is not a
conservative, and I am fine with that.
Speaking as a liberal, it is not my place to define what a conservative
is, but I can think of many definitions of conservative – cautious, prudent,
distrustful of the state, distrustful of any excessive accumulation of power,
adhering to traditional religion or traditional values, promoting moral
restraint, believing in the rule of law, conscious of the danger of demagogic
appeals to people’s basest instincts, etc. – that Trump clearly does not
meet. But it is absurd to conclude from
that that since Trump is not a conservative, he must be a liberal, or that he
is a phenomenon of the left rather than the right. No, no and no! His eagerness to enact the priorities of the
Republican donor class, his appeal to so much of the traditional Republican
coalition, his loud and aggressive feud with all things liberal are clear proof
that, although Trump may not be a conservative, he is definitely right wing.
And to any
anti-Trump conservative who takes offense that that statement, I would suggest
that liberals might have something to offer there. See, we have a history of having to deal with
Communism. And there is no need to lie
or mince words. Many liberals and
radicals succumbed to its allure, took its promises at face value, and because
fellow travelers or useful idiots. But
even from the start there were many who did not, who saw through the danger and
denounced Communism as evil from the start. And with the
onset of the Cold War, opposition to Communism became the clear dividing line
between respectable liberals (and left-wingers) and people outside of any
reasonable bounds.
So how was a
liberal to deal with Communism? It
wasn’t liberal, not liberal was defined to mean favoring liberty, inclusion,
universal human rights, rule of law, openness, tolerance, or the other terms
liberals used to define themselves. Yet
it did appear to be left-wing. Like liberals, it did challenge the status quo of power and purport to be a movement championing
the oppressed. In fact, it actually did
champion the rights of the oppressed in countries where it had not yet seized
power. It was pointless to deny that
really was left wing. So what was a
liberal to make of a movement that shared liberals’ own criticisms of the
status quo of power and championship of society’s unfortunates, even as it
wrote vast swaths of humanity out of its moral calculations altogether, and
often seemed to be motivated more by hatred and appeals to base instinct more
than anything else, to say nothing of
its monstrous crimes against humanity.
Our answer, in the end, was that there was a hard left, by no
means limited to the Communists, that shared many values and ultimate goals
with liberals, but was utterly opposed to us in many others. We called it the illiberal left.
Well,
conservatives might was well admit that Donald Trump shares a lot of goals and
values with them. He wants to cut taxes
and gut regulations. He distrusts
government in all its “mommy” functions and any special measures to promote the
status of racial and ethnic minorities. He is an instinctive hawk on foreign policy and a champion of law and order.
In all of this one might as well admit Trump is right wing. But he differs from true conservatives in
these other aspects. So why not come out
and acknowledge the existence of an un-conservative right. Place Donald Trump in it, along with slave
holders, classical fascists, and their modern heirs such as the LePens and the
other rabid nationalist parties in Europe today.
And, yes, liberals will no doubt continue to
blur the lines, just as many conservatives blurred the lines between liberal
and Communist. But once you get the
basic concept that there are unwholesome people on your side if the divide, and that people on your side of the divide have the first responsibility to police the distinction, we
will be drawing closer to a reasonable dialogue on President Trump and how to
deal with him.
No comments:
Post a Comment