Damage in the wake of Maria |
Even as I post pictures of the damage Hurricane Maria has left in Puerto Rico, I can’t
imagine what conditions must be like. I can only go by what I have personally
experienced.
I was in
Honduras about a year after Hurricane Mitch.
Mitch was a Category 5 hurricane with 180 mph winds. I had assumed that those winds devastated
Honduras, but I was apparently wrong.
The winds hit only an island offshore.
By the time Mitch landed, it had downgraded to a tropical storm. The rain, not the wind, was what caused the
damage. By all accounts it was horrific,
flooding everywhere, mudslide on the mountains, buildings shoulder deep in mud
and so forth. But there was no sign of
it by the time I got there. There were
markings of how high the mud got, but it was all cleared off. The bananas that had drowned were all
replanted. The buildings were still
standing. People had horror stories to
tell, and there were many subtle signs that below the surface all was not well,
but no signs to the casual observer that anything had happened. Only the coconut trees were dying, of some
disease spread by the hurricane.
More damage |
I was in New
Orleans about six months after Katrina, and it was obvious to even the most
casual observer that there was a problem.
The airport looked normal enough, and so did the French Quarter and
certain shopping malls. There were
places where the levies had breached on one side of the river but not the
other. On one side the lights would be
on and all would be functioning; on the other all ruin. Again, the damage was not the wind, but the
flooding. There were areas along the
waterways and further down the river where everything was wiped out. Houses in the Ninth Ward had obvious
structural damage and were not salvageable.
But where I
was working the houses were still standing, soaked, but structures intact. The people were (mostly) evacuated and the
houses (mostly) empty. But they were
standing. They looked OK from the outside. Once we got in, they were soaked and dried
out. Items in closets, linen cupboards
and the like were not dried out and stank.
Kitchens had water pooling in pots and pans and were growing black mold
that smelled of sulfur. They reeked of
rotting food. Drywall that had been
soaked and dried was easy to pull off.
Throwing away the belongings gave a painfully intimate view of people’s
private lives. Occasionally a synthetic
stuffed animal or oil painting survived surprisingly well. But for the most part only the china was
salvageable. There was no electricity or
running water. When we worked in a
neighborhood, FEMA management would leave a Port-a-Potty somewhere on the block.
The trash
service picking up all the debris we removed from the houses had run out its
contract just before we arrived. Huge
piles of trash built up alongside the houses.
The owners who came back were not in their houses anymore, but in FEMA
trailers parked in the driveway. I can
only assume the used batteries and tank water.
Their refrigerators were too small to hold any extended supply of food. This meant having to shop every day, when the
nearest grocery store might be miles and miles away, so many people ate in
cafeterias set up by local churches and disaster relief agencies. There was no running water, so people picked
up bottled water daily from FEMA.
In
commercial districts, stores were boarded up for block after block. Churches were open, serving as relief
centers. I also saw a veterinary clinic
that was open. Home Depot was open, and
doing a lot of business for people making repairs. One of the cashiers commented that she went
from home to work and work to home, trying not to look around and see what had
become of her city. We saw a Walgreen’s
and a gas station open in the time we were there. Each
opening was greeted with great rejoicing.
The gas station had an ATM on the premises, the only one available for
miles around because all the banks were closed.
It also used a Port-a-Potty because it had no running water. There were shopping malls were everything was
working. They were extremely bustling,
partly (I assume) because there weren’t many places to shop and partly (I assume)
as part of the desperate attempt by people to distract themselves from the
conditions all around. Fire stations had
re-opened. Schools had not.
And recall
that about 80% of the people had been evacuated and missed the worst. The 20% who stayed were a manageable number
to rescue. But in the relatively short
time that it took, with the lack of food, water, medicine and sanitation,
social discipline started breaking down.
I have not
been to Houston, but presumably conditions are similar, except that people are
still living there. I like to think that
this means recovery will be quicker because there will be a large work force at
hand to clean up. And certainly it will
not be all that far a drive to unflooded parts of Texas with plenty of
resources at hand.
Now compare
Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico did get the
full force of Category 4 winds. Numerous buildings are not just flooded, but destroyed. Staying warm will not be an issue, since
Puerto Rico is hot and muggy. But how
will people stay dry? The power is out
over 90% of the island. This is a worse
disaster than, say, loss of power in Haiti where many people never had
electricity in the first place and society operated without it. Loss of electricity where people depend on it
is a formula for disaster. Less than
half the people have access to clean water.
Food supplies must be running out fast.
The roads and entire infrastructure is destroyed, preventing supplies
from being shipped in. People in the
mountains can presumably at least come down to the cities looking for relief
supplies. But how does a city, itself in ruins, cope with such an influx? Puerto Rico is an island, making overland
evacuation impossible; everyone leaving must go by ship. It has 3.5 million inhabitants. Evacuation is impossible.
This is what
it looks like when a whole society is truly destroyed all at once.
No comments:
Post a Comment